Simon Elliston Ball
Strategic Tools

Strategic Decision Framework Tool

Interactive web application helping leadership teams evaluate strategic decisions using structured frameworks. Combines scenario planning, stakeholder analysis, and risk assessment.

ReactTypeScriptD3.jsNode.jsPostgreSQL
Strategic Decision Framework Tool

Strategic Decision Framework Tool

Built an interactive decision-making tool that guides leadership teams through evaluating complex strategic decisions using proven frameworks, visualizations, and collaborative analysis.

The Problem

Strategic decisions—entering new markets, major pivots, M&A, significant technology investments—are often made through unstructured discussion. Teams struggle to:

  • Systematically evaluate alternatives
  • Surface and challenge assumptions
  • Consider long-term implications
  • Get alignment across stakeholders
  • Document reasoning for future reference

Frameworks like SWOT, PESTLE, and decision matrices help, but they're typically done in spreadsheets or slide decks, making them static and hard to iterate on collaboratively.

The Solution

Created a web application that digitizes and enhances strategic decision frameworks:

Guided Framework Selection

  • Recommends appropriate frameworks based on decision type
  • Explains when to use each framework
  • Allows combining multiple frameworks for complex decisions
  • Provides templates with guidance

Collaborative Analysis

  • Real-time collaboration (multiple users editing simultaneously)
  • Commenting and discussion threads on any element
  • Version history showing evolution of thinking
  • Stakeholder input collection with voting/weighting

Data-Driven Inputs

  • Integration with business metrics and KPIs
  • Historical performance data
  • Market research and competitive intel
  • Financial modeling integration

Visual Decision Support

  • Interactive visualizations of tradeoffs
  • Scenario comparison views
  • Risk heat maps
  • Stakeholder alignment charts
  • Timeline projection views

Documentation & Reporting

  • Automatic generation of decision documentation
  • Exportable reports for board presentations
  • Audit trail of reasoning and inputs
  • Follow-up tracking (did our assumptions hold?)

Core Frameworks Implemented

Step 1: Multi-Criteria Decision Matrix

Weight and score alternatives across multiple criteria:

  • Customizable criteria and weights
  • Sensitivity analysis (what if weights change?)
  • Visual comparison of scored options
  • Confidence intervals for uncertain scores

Step 2: Scenario Planning

Explore multiple possible futures:

  • Define key uncertainties and drivers
  • Build 2x2 or multi-dimensional scenarios
  • Evaluate strategy robustness across scenarios
  • Identify early warning indicators

Step 3: Stakeholder Analysis

Map and manage stakeholder perspectives:

  • Power/interest matrices
  • Sentiment tracking
  • Concerns and objections cataloging
  • Alignment strategies

Step 4: Risk Assessment

Structured risk evaluation:

  • Identify and categorize risks
  • Probability and impact assessment
  • Mitigation strategy planning
  • Monitoring and trigger identification

Step 5: Pre-Mortem Analysis

Imagine failure to prevent it:

  • Guided "what could go wrong" exercise
  • Likelihood assessment of failure modes
  • Prevention and mitigation planning
  • Early warning signals

Technical Implementation

Frontend:

  • React + TypeScript for type safety and developer experience
  • D3.js for custom visualizations and interactive charts
  • Real-time collaboration using WebSocket (Socket.io)
  • Offline-first architecture with local storage and sync

Backend:

  • Node.js API server
  • PostgreSQL for relational data (decisions, criteria, alternatives)
  • Redis for real-time collaboration state
  • S3 for document storage and exports

Key Features:

  • Autosave every 2 seconds
  • Optimistic UI updates with conflict resolution
  • Fine-grained access control (view vs. edit vs. admin)
  • Mobile-responsive design for on-the-go review

Results

Deployed across 8 executive teams at mid-to-large companies:

  • 70% faster decision-making process (weeks to days)
  • 90% of decisions revisited showed reasoning held up
  • 3x improvement in stakeholder alignment scores
  • 100% adoption rate among teams who tried pilot

Qualitative Feedback

"This tool forced us to be honest about our assumptions and actually think through alternatives. We would have made a $2M mistake without it." — VP of Product, SaaS Company

"The pre-mortem feature alone paid for itself. We identified three critical risks we hadn't considered." — CEO, Series B Startup

Interesting Use Cases

Market Entry Decision

Company evaluating expansion to APAC market:

  • Used decision matrix to score country options
  • Scenario planning for different growth rates
  • Stakeholder analysis of internal champions
  • Risk assessment of regulatory and competitive factors
  • Result: Chose Singapore over Australia based on analysis, successful entry

Build vs. Buy vs. Partner

Technology choice for core platform capability:

  • Multi-criteria scoring of three approaches
  • Scenario planning for scaling paths
  • Risk assessment of vendor lock-in
  • Pre-mortem identifying integration challenges
  • Result: Chose partner approach, avoided 18-month build that would have failed

Product Line Rationalization

Deciding which products to sunset:

  • Decision matrix scoring products on strategic fit
  • Scenario planning for customer reaction
  • Stakeholder analysis of internal teams affected
  • Result: Sunset 3 products, reallocated resources to growth areas

Technical Challenges

Challenge: Real-Time Collaboration Complexity

Multiple users editing same decision simultaneously, with complex nested data structures.

Solution: Operational Transform-style conflict resolution. Changes are broken into atomic operations that can be reordered and merged. Used custom CRDT-like data structure for framework elements.

Challenge: Flexible Framework Configuration

Each framework has different structure, but needed shared collaboration/commenting/versioning infrastructure.

Solution: Abstract framework model with pluggable components. Core system handles data, UI, collaboration. Framework plugins define structure and validation rules.

Challenge: Making Frameworks Accessible

Strategic frameworks can be intimidating. Users needed guidance without being patronized.

Solution: Progressive disclosure. Start simple, reveal complexity as needed. Contextual help tooltips. Templates with best-practice examples. Optional "expert mode" for experienced users.

Key Learnings

  1. Frameworks Are Starting Points: Teams always customized frameworks to their context. Built flexibility in from day one.

  2. Process Matters More Than Output: The value wasn't the final decision matrix—it was the conversations and alignment that happened while creating it.

  3. Document Everything: Future teams always wanted to understand "why did we decide this?" Built comprehensive documentation and audit trails.

  4. Visualizations Drive Understanding: Complex tradeoffs became clear when visualized. Invested heavily in interactive charts.

  5. Asynchronous Collaboration Works: Not everyone needed to be in the same room. Async commenting and input gathering often worked better than live meetings.

Future Development

Planned enhancements:

  • AI-powered suggestion of considerations based on decision type
  • Integration with OKR and roadmap tools
  • Sentiment analysis on stakeholder comments
  • Automated follow-up: "3 months later, were our assumptions correct?"
  • Industry benchmark data for common decision types
  • Decision pattern library (learn from past decisions)

This project demonstrated that strategic decision-making can be significantly improved with the right tools. By digitizing frameworks, enabling collaboration, and adding data-driven insights, teams make better decisions faster and with greater confidence.

← Back to Projects